CORONIS RENTALS

Australia's Rental Crisis with Coronis Rentals Sunshine Coast Treating Tenants as a Disposable Commodity, who now shine the spotlight back on the Asshole Agents & Property Owners.

CASE STUDY - SUBJECT PROPERTY 8 Musa Place Aroona QLD 4551.
Moving house is generally considered one of life’s most stressful events (archive).
Coronis and their Property Owner clients (the Katarias), have severely interfered with and disrupted the lives of a family of Vulnerable, Pensioner & Disability Tenants, in an inconsiderate, unlawful and disrespectful way, so as to enable their own greedy ends, and then retaliate when the tenants assert their legal rights. The latest is that Coronis (by way of Eliza Black), LIES to QCAT so as to escape the legal consequences, all while Andrew Coronis Principal, while knowing about the lies and being so wrapped up in believing his own bullshit, does absolutely nothing about them. This is the extent of criminality that Coronis stoops to in property rental activities, to which the Office of Fair Trading Licensing has expressed interest, and saying it is a matter for Queensland Police Service to investigate.

THE QCAT APPLICATION NOW BEING APPEALED
Coronis Fabricated Evidence

It starts with a THREAT from the Property Manager (Eliza Black) in a no-negotiation, take-it-or-leave it scenario...

THE THREAT..."Please read your new tenancy agreement and ensure it is signed and returned within 7 days from the date of this offer, as a periodic lease is not an option. Failure to sign the new Tenancy Agreement within the time frame will result in a form 12 Notice to Leave being issued which will require you to vacate on the expiry of your current tenancy agreement".

HIDDEN WITHIN THE AGREEMENT (42 pages of legalese), WITHOUT ANY NOTICE OF A CHANGE, WAS AN UNCONSCIONABLE (onerous) TERM - with Coronis having a superior bargaining position than that of the tenants.
THE TENANTS LEGAL RIGHTS WERE ASSERTED, RESULTING IN A NOTICE TO LEAVE, BASED ON THE TENANTS NOT AGREEING TO THE ONEROUS TERM IN THE LEASE RENEWAL. THIS WAS NOT ONLY UNCONSCIONABLE, BUT IT ALSO AMOUNTED TO RETALIATION WHICH IS ALSO UNLAWFUL.

THEY SIMPLY COULDN'T CARE LESS

And for the sake of GREED with RECKLESS INDIFFERENCE to the trauma caused to the tenants, they think nothing of wrongfully requiring a family of Aged Pensioners and Disability Tenants to leave their Family Home and struggle in the current Rental Crisis, like sheep being herded around in a foggy paddock. One wonders how these Property Manager and Property Owner morons, would like it if they were treated like that, and be kicked out of their family home. And when taken to task at QCAT, they JUST LIE and the Andrew Coronis owner/manager just buries his head in the sand, which can only make the "giving and helping others" facade that he portrays of himself... just BULLSHIT!!!
I wonder what Her Honour District Court Judge Jennifer Rosengren thinks about that, being a director of what in my opinion is a sleazy image laundering project i.e, the Coronis Foundation Trust.

In the first test of statutory Unconscionable Conduct, it became quite apparent that the QCAT Adjudicator had no idea of the purpose of Unconscionable Conduct legislation, or how it can be applied to stamp out behaviour that has been pleaded in the Statement of Claim. For the Adjudicator to say that it doesn't apply to "Normal Practice" or "Common Practice" or "Business as Usual" in the property rental industry, when in this case the practice was to threaten (the THREAT) the tenants with eviction if they refused to accept onerous conditions, is by far the most absurd comment I have ever heard from a Judicial Officer in over 30 years of following and participating in litigation.

SO IN EFFECT the QCAT Adjudicator decided, that it was "Normal Practice", "Common Practice" and "Business as Usual" for tenants to be threatened with eviction in negotiations to RENEW the lease on their family home, and if they refused to agree to any harebrained ONEROUS TERM that the Property Manager required, being clearly unconscionable to the minds of the tenants, they could choose to not agree to the Onerous Term and receive a Notice to Leave, and then would have to move their family home to somewhere else, perhaps into their car or down to the local park in a tent. Along with Eliza Black, Coronis and the Kataria Property Owners, the Adjudicator didn't give a damn either, and went along with people that live in their Dog Eat Dog World.

THE "ABSOLUTE LIE": Over FIVE months AFTER the THREAT, and at the QCAT Tribunal hearing, Eliza Black Coronis Property Manager walked back from the THREAT & ONEROUS TERM, and by way of complete surprise to the tenants, LIED to the Tribunal that it had all been an ADMINISTRATIVE ERROR, a so called error that had not been communicated to the tenants for over the FIVE MONTHS period. (SEE the Evidence Brief)
It is just amazing, that QCAT be allowed to dish out judgements that are so utterly and completely wrong by way of an inept Adjudicator, who... while being totally unconcerned by the trauma caused to the tenants (with one ending up in hospital)...
ALSO COMPLETELY FAILED to interrogate Eliza Black Property Manager, when it was POINTED OUT LOUD at the hearing by the tenants to the Adjudicator, that Black was LYING about the Administrative Error designed to (and which did), take the tenants by complete surprise, thus causing an automatic Denial of Procedural Fairness.
SEE the Evidence Brief at: THE ELIZA BLACK LIES

FURTHER given Tonya Marshall Adjudicator was the QCAT Registrar before taking up the position of Adjudicator on 11 August 2023 (just 18 days before the hearing on the 29 August), she likely had a working relationship with many Property Managers.
Is it appropriate for a Registrar to become an Adjudicator in tenancy disputes
given a potential conflict of interest and the impartiality requirement of an Adjudicator.

As to Common Law Duty of Care, well I believe that if the Adjudicator cannot find it within her narrow focus on the RTRA Act tenancy legislation (while ignoring contemporaneous legislation), then she probably believes it doesn't exist...

Justice Martin: in Sino Iron Pty Ltd v Mineralogy Pty Ltd [No 15][2023] WASC 56 @131(e).
...the entire contextual background underlying what was to be evaluated as suggested unconscionable conduct was essential...
The totally inept Adjudicator, took less than 2 minutes to sum up the Application by stating: "I can find no unconscionable conduct here".

PREDICTABLE RESULT - Q1363-23

1. Yes predictable given my previous experience of how QCAT operates (which has been confirmed by the Residential Tenancy Authority). At the First Hearing you can come before an arrogant and (in my experience of having an Application dismissed for using the wrong form, in a matter that QCAT does not provide a form for, i.e, subsection 12(4)(c) of the QCAT Act... Trader v Trader) incompetent "Adjudicator", who only wants to get rid of the matter in around 15 minutes, by quickly scanning the material while (at this Hearing), gleefully being misled by a lying Property Manager's Bald-faced Lies, to which the tenants were taken by total surprise and strongly objected out loud, and to which the Adjudicator conveniently ignored. One could almost say they were mates, by the adjudicator being so gullible and actually answering issues on behalf of Ms. Black. In fact while being downright dismissive of the claim of Unconscionable Conduct by the tenants and their wish to have rental security by way of a long term lease of their family home, the adjudicator was so keen the accept the version of a lying Property Manager, she even came up with excuses that were not materially relevant to the issue, such as wrongly legitimising a loophole that Property Managers use to override the legislation, and answering a question on behalf of Ms. Black, so as to assist the lying Property Manager's fabrication of false & misleading evidence. This QCAT Tribunal, while also being completely out of touch with Australian Consumer Law, not only invites and encourages procedural unfairness, it has become everso apparent that Real Estate & Rental Agents use this procedural unfairness to their advantage, by Gaming the System so... TENANTS BEWARE of CUNNING PROPERTY MANAGERS & INEPT ADJUDICATORS.

2. Lying to the QCAT Tribunal is an offence, and in all my (Gordon Craven) 30 odd years of experience at court hearings, I have never experienced anything close to the shabby bias and lack of procedural fairness encountered at this First Hearing. Ms. Black Coronis Property Manager had given notice that she would not be appearing at the Tribunal Hearing, but in fact surprisingly did appear via video (taking the tenants by surprise), despite her authority to appear on behalf of the First Respondents having expired, by reason of the expiry of the Tenancy Agreement.

3. SO the matter (as initially predicted) has been filed with the QCAT Appeal Tribunal. In my experience with Members of the Appeal Tribunal, they actually know what they are doing, and an excellent 5 Star result can be obtained, albeit the hearing taking many months to occur, and a further fee being required. SUBMISSIONS BY TENANTS TO THE TRIBUNAL HEARING + THE NUTSHELL

4. By viewing submissions to the Appeal regarding this disgraceful behaviour by Ms. Black and the Adjudicator, there can be found absolutely zero evidence to disprove the evidence that clearly shows Ms. Black to be a liar. One would have thought that QCAT would be keen to address the facts of a Property Manager lying to the Tribunal, which QLD Office of Fair Trading states to be a matter for Police Investigation. NOT SO, it is now nearing the end of June 2024 (10 months after the Hearing), and the Appeal Tribunal remains silent.

COMPLAINT TO QCAT & ITS PRESIDENT

A response was requested to a QCAT "Satisfaction Survey" 2023-24. The above 1, 2, 3 & 4 paragraphs formed part of the response to the Survey. Having completed that, on 27 June 2024 a copy was also transmitted to the current QCAT President, Justice Kerri Mellifont Supreme Court Judge. The requirements of the QCAT President are set out HERE, which sets out in part; "as a member, hearing significant matters in the tribunal". SO, is lying to the Tribunal significant

The bottom line is... on 29 August 2023 Adjudicator Marshall permitted wilful fabricated and false evidence, tendered by Eliza Black Coronis Property Manager, to influence a QCAT Tribunal finding. What does QCAT & Coronis do about it NOTHING (that the tenants are aware of), as at 15 July 2024.

"It's not the crime, it's the cover up that gets you"
WATERGATE ~ ABC

In Procedural Unfairness and Gaming the System, the CORONIS Property Manager ELIZA BLACK representing the Respondents (who had provided various false identities of her employer, and finally Identified S.N.A. GROUP PTY LTD. ACN: 113 271 766 to be her Coronis employer), provided calculated False and Misleading Information (THE LIE / COVER UP) to the QCAT Tribunal Hearing regarding THE CORE ISSUE, and did so as agent for the OWNERS Saurav & Ashleigh Kataria and an employee of CORONIS (S.N.A. Group P/L), thereby implicating them in this LIE and managing to exhibit the Coronis Crooked Culture. This should be (but probably won't be), acute embarrassment to Adjudicator Tonya Marshall ex Registrar, who similarly in a couldn't-care-less attitude, had ABSOLUTE ZERO concern or empathy for Vulnerable Pensioner and Disability Tenants, and despite one Tenant being hospitalised because of the turmoil Ms.BLACK had created.
THE TRIBUNAL LAPPED UP THE LIES AND ACCORDINGLY WAS MISLED
Apart from lapping up the lies, the transcript shows the most fundamental error (among many) that the Adjudicator made, in stating:
"Well, the real estate agent and the owners can adjust the terms of their lease as to suit their circumstances. The tenant can accept or not the new lease terms."
AND
"...the form 12 was issued as part of business as usual in an attempt to negotiate a new lease, the choice was up to the tenants whether or not to accept the new lease."

This can be true for new tenancy offers where prospective tenants are looking for a new home to rent. However to offer pensioner & disabled tenants a lease renewal for their existing home, containing an absolutely onerous term (which the lying Ms. Black now attempts to cover up, by 5 months later for the first time by surprise at the hearing... stating it to be an "Administrative Error"), with a threat of a Notice to Leave if not accepted, is clearly unethical, unfair, unconscionable and downright nasty. Even Andrew Coronis says that moving home can be an "anxious, stressful and somewhat insecure time", and at 73 & 75 years of age, my wife and I find it to be horrendous, and also deeply troubling when we find out that Ashleigh Kataria (AKA Ashleigh Rusk) owner, authorised the Notice to Leave in such a casual snd uncaring manner.
However, by the Adjudicator clearly having zero understanding of the Unconscionable Conduct provisions of Australian Consumer Law (or even some common sense regarding fairness), Ms. Black got away with lying to QCAT.
>SEE WHY THE LIE<
OR
ElizaBlack.Coronis.Rentals
**Fabricating the "Administrative Error", is in fact the REAL ERROR
AND a failure to admit it, demonstrates how low Coronis can go.

IT'S NO WONDER THAT QCAT HAS SO MANY** BAD BAD BAD GOOGLE REVIEWS
The Appeal Application is HERE,
The Appeal Tribunal Directions document is HERE.
Submissions according to ITEM 2 OF QCAT DIRECTIONS set out substantial evidence that irrefutably exposes the truth about Ms. Black and her cohorts.
The contempt, stupidity & arrogance that this clown inflicts on tenants, especially when ALL of the Coronis People stay silent about the behaviour (except for the clueless Leanne Parsons), the behaviour can only be a shining example of the Coronis culture towards... those pesky lower class tenants.

APPELLANT SUBMISSIONS ARE COMPLETED

QCAT APPEAL SUBMISSIONS to the APPEAL according to DIRECTIONS (No.2).
The Timeline clearly exposes the fabrication that Eliza Black used to mislead the QCAT Tribunal. If the purported "Administrative Error" had existed in fact, it is logical that it would have been communicated to the tenants to address their lease renewal complaints, in the months prior to the QCAT hearing. The question that arises is whether the First Respondents instructed or conspired (it appears they may have colluded) with Ms. Black to lie, or Ms. Black did it without their knowledge, because it was Coronis Crooked Culture to do so in an attempt to railroad the tenants into an onerous lease agreement. The First Respondents have declined to tell their side of the saga. Lying to the QCAT Tribunal and causing an erroneous finding is a most serious matter, and can be likened to criminal perjury and/or attempting to pervert the course of justice (in this case successfully doing so). Let's see what the Respondents come up with at the Direction (No.3) of the Appeal Tribunal.

Is this the culture of all Coronis Property Managers & Franchisees I think maybe not, however what do they do about it Well nothing so far... given that the web stats document the huge amount of Coronis People visiting this publication, instead of voicing concern about the bad behaviour, like a flock of sheep they appear to be just toeing the company line, by closing ranks and turning a blind eye, thus adding fuel to their profession being that of the Least Trusted in Australia (archive).

RESPONDENT SUBMISSIONS

In her usual fashion, Ms. Black has filed and served, unsigned, and undated Response Submissions along with annexures (QCAT submissions are required to be signed & dated), and omits the Second Respondent as being a party. It appears she doesn't like putting her name and date to her work or naming S.N.A. Group Pty Ltd.
SUMMARY
While being presented with evidence that cannot be denied, the idiot Coronis Crew choose to skirt around it by ignoring it.
Doubling down on alleged lies about the administrative error, without explaining how the purported error came about.
No explanation as to how the purported administrative error was not communicated to the tenants, until by surprise at the hearing some months later.
Total avoidance of submitting direct responses to the numbered paragraphs of the Appellant Submissions, and in particular ZERO RESPONSE to the core issues at sub-paragraphs 5(e), 5(f), 5(g), 5(h), 5(i), 5(j), 5(k), 5(l), 5(m), 5(n), 5(o) and 5(p), along with paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9, thus causing the submissions to be shambolic and difficult to follow.
Evidence of Ms. Black's culture (The Coronis/Black Culture), in believing that she and property owners (along with the Adjudicator's apparent consent to this culture), can impose with impunity, any onerous and unconscionable conditions they dream up in lease renewal offers to vulnerable tenants, with threat of Form 12 Notice to Leave if not accepted.

The Appellant's Reply to the Respondent's Submissions is being prepared, which will also include evidence of Eliza Black having no authority to represent the First Respondents at the hearing on 29 August and also in this Appeal, on the basis that the Tenancy Agreement that provided authority had ended, and the Second Respondent for reasons that will be in the Reply document. As such the Appeal Tribunal will likely be requested to strike out the Respondent Submissions, despite them being as bad and ineffectual, the bullshit happens to be.

DIRECTOR DILEMMA
Unravelling like an Agatha Christie mystery, Ms. Black has been requested to provide details regarding her authority to represent/stand in the place of the Respondents and copied to Debi Marr (Sunshine Coast) Agency DIRECTOR, upon which Tracey Kelly (Property Management State DIRECTOR), responded with an outright refusal, resulting in a QCAT Form 40 Application for a Direction that the authority details be provided. All this and much more is being put to the QCAT Appeal Tribunal...
STAY TUNED to see how deep the hole gets, that these 3 Coronis ladies with "Genuine Gifted Minds" are digging for themselves, when they have been provided with evidence that the Coronis Second Respondent has totally avoided responding to the lies and fabrication issues concocted by Eliza Black - Property Management Team Leader...

GROUNDS OF APPEAL

1. The Applicants were taken by surprise by the Respondents introducing False & Misleading Information (FMI) to the Tribunal which was received as evidence.
2. The introduction of the FMI evidence, was a calculated attempt to mislead the Tribunal.
3. The Tribunal was misled by the FMI evidence, thus causing erroneous findings.
4. There was no reliance on FMI evidence within the Response filed in the Registry to the Statement of Claim. As such the Response was misleading by omission, in the circumstances of Ground 1.
5. The Adjudicator erred, by giving weight to the FMI evidence that was false and did not exist, in particular the evidence of an “Administrative Error”.
6. The Adjudicator erred, by not giving proper weight to the true facts in the Statement of Claim before the Tribunal, evidencing that there could be no “Administrative Error”.
7. The Adjudicator erred, in not applying the provisions of Australian Consumer Law, by finding that behaviour alleged as unconscionable in the Statement of Claim was not unconscionable, by reason of the behaviour being “normal practice” or “common practice”.
8. Once written reasons and transcript are received, many instances of bias will be provided in submissions, which show the Adjudicator favouring the Respondents.

The behaviour regarding lease renewal (AS PER ABOVE):
by way of the wording within documents “B” and “E” of the Evidence Schedule (with Ms. Black admitting it to be heavy handed and demanding), which was seen by the tenants to be a non negotiable DEMAND to sign a 12 month lease renewal within 7 days if they wanted to keep their tenancy; and
with the proposed lease renewal containing an unconscionable special term hidden within 42 pages of legalese, that gained the owners an unfair BENEFIT that the owners were not entitled to; and
along with a THREAT to issue a Form 12 Notice to Leave if the lease is not signed;
COULD BE SEEN as a form of Extortion as defined by section 415 of the Queensland Criminal Code. For the Adjudicator to excuse the behaviour of DEMAND & THREAT to be “Normal Practice” & "Business as Usual" within the property rental industry, is remarkable, and sets the scene for unfortunate tenants in Queensland, that come before a QCAT Adjudicator, who just doubles down on the power imbalance that a tenant already suffers. IT'S ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFUL!!!

THE CORONIS WAY...

BULLYING & INTIMIDATION.
Serially providing false & misleading information as to its legal corporate identity in the QCAT proceeding.
Continuing with spiteful retaliation and lack of common decency, in refusing to provide a reference for the tenants.
Attempting to have tenants sign up to an open ended Direct Debit Authority for any amount Coronis "DEEMS PAYABLE" from the bank account of a tenant, and a penalty of $30.00 applying if the money "Deemed Payable" is not there". SEE THE DIRECT DEBIT FORM and those that attempted to implement it Eliza Black / Tracey Kelly.
SUBSEQUENTLY... LYING & MISLEADING the QCAT TRIBUNAL.
AND THEN... ISSUING RIDICULOUS & SEEMINGLY FABRICATED CLAIMS Against the $3,200 Bond of the tenants held by the RTA.
IN AN ATTEMPT to Rip-Off the tenants. SEE THE CORONIS BOND BANDIT.

PREVIOUSLY...

Despite being given the Notice to Leave, the tenants stood their ground and didn't move out because the Notice was Retaliatory and Unlawful under the RTRA Act (sections 291 & 246A). As such, Coronis and the Property Owners squibbed on seeking a QCAT order for possession. So the tenant's tenancy defaulted to a periodic tenancy, as long as they kept paying the rent ($810.00 per week), until the Owners come up with a another reason to evict them.
OBVIOUSLY... tenants that stick up for their rights are not welcome.
MUST SEE EXAMPLE OF CORONIS BULLSHIT
However the tenants lost the security of their fixed term tenancy, and along with not wanting to do business with Coronis (the QCAT Second Respondent) and their clients (the QCAT First Respondents) any more, the tenants sought a replacement fixed term tenancy along with legislative compensation for the expenses incurred for having to relocate their family home, which they have now succeeded in doing.

A SNAPSHOT OF THE CORONIS CLIENT SNOBS:

It is standard practise that Rental Agents & Property Owners require tenants to undergo invasion of their privacy via data gouging outfits like 2Apply. This requires answering a whole lot of unnecessary and invasive questions multiple times, along with providing private documents such as bank statements, and having the tenant pay for his or her own background check to get another star on a tenancy application. While inflicting further unreasonable requirements upon their tenants as is set out in the QCAT Claim, the First Respondent Property Owners (Saurav Kataria (AKA Sunny) & Ashleigh Kataria), have the audacity to complain to QCAT as follows, upon being served with legal documents:
Ashleigh Kataria owner wrote:
"...we [Ashleigh & Saurav Kataria who works for Air Services Australia;
saurav.kataria@airservicesaustralia.com], were both quite concerned and uncomfortable, regarding how our personal details (contact number and address) were included in this QCAT submission, as we had never provided our direct contact details to the tenants. In fact, all management of the property is done through Coronis team, and they have also confirmed that our details have never been shared with the tenants. Hoping this information has not been obtained through inappropriate or questionable means." THE AUDACIOUS IDIOTIC HYPOCRISY

Watch this space...

DONE NOTHING
Despite claiming to have, "8,000 properties under management with an estimated value of $4.22 billion", and all of the rest of the claims HERE, it is particularly noted that Andrew Coronis and his People (with the exception of one ex-employee), that are not involved in the legal proceeding, have done absolutely nothing to address, competently dispute or investigate the allegations contained herein, apart from WHINGING in their attempts to shut this website down.
COMPLAINTS IGNORED
AND at no time did the Principal Licensee (Debi Marr) at Coronis Sunshine Coast, address the previous written complaints of the Tenants as required by PART 5—COMPLAINT RESOLUTION of the Property Agents and Motor Dealers Regulations.
AS SUCH
Given the Coronis behaviour being clearly not within the REIQ Standards of Business Practice and the Property Agents and Motor Dealers Regulations, and the obvious failure to address the situation, one must presume that the Coronis people believe the Coronis behaviour to be acceptable, which just adds evidence to the Real Estate Industry, and in particular Coronis, being the Least Trusted Profession in Australia.

INTERESTING... development in Victoria where a VCAT application to evict tenants was dismissed, because the tenants would have become homeless.

This Sydney Morning Herald article reports that VCAT Member Kylea Campana found that a family of five would be rendered homeless by a possession order, and as such dismissed the landlord's application to evict the tenants because the property was being sold. The Member suggested a course of action could be that the home be sold with the tenants in place, which may even add value to the property when the home has such good tenants.
SEE THE DECISION: Danrell v Morris (Residential Tenancies) [2022] VCAT 1303
SEE MUCH MORE: The Reasonable & Proportionate Test

More about the Appeal

The CoronaVirus Within Our Society

The Coronis Bully answer to Tenants who stand up for their rights...IS TO EVICT THEM!!!Lies, Dishonesty, Fabrication, Retaliation & Bond Bandit,it's all part of the Coronis Way

It starts with a THREAT from the Property Manager (Eliza Black) in a no-negotiation, take-it-or-leave it scenario...

THE CORONIS PLAN

THEY SIMPLY COULDN'T CARE LESS

CHOICE ARTICLE 22 April 2024"We have seen people receive a rent increase and an eviction notice at the same time and essentially told to pick one"

TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY

But what about Common Decency?

Was this too much to ask?

AND ALSO

FURTHER...

Along with contraventions of the RTRA Actthere are:POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL LEGAL RIGHTS AVAILABLE TO TENANTS

THESE LEGAL RIGHTS ARE BEING TESTED

IN QCAT TENANCY PROCEEDINGS

UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT 101

"To the lay-person, it should be seen a shield available to courts to protect vulnerable parties from conduct that is particularly harsh or oppressive." LEARN MORE

PREDICTABLE RESULT - Q1363-23

COMPLAINT TO QCAT & ITS PRESIDENT

"It's not the crime, it's the cover up that gets you"WATERGATE ~ ABC

APPELLANT SUBMISSIONS ARE COMPLETED

RESPONDENT SUBMISSIONS

The Extortion Argument

THE CORONIS WAY...

How does this fit in with the Andrew Coronis vision?

PREVIOUSLY...

THE OWNERS...

First Respondents

A SNAPSHOT OF THE CORONIS CLIENT SNOBS:

CORONIS USES 2APPLY

Talking about PRIVACY... Coronis uses 2Apply. Apparently it's OK for property owners to be protected from being identified, while tenants have to undergo the ordeals of 2Apply.SEE THE 2APPLY REVIEW

Renters Rights from Choice | RentTech Platforms | Agents Shifting Costs to Renters

About Unconscionable Conduct& Coronis Real Estate Rentals in Action:

VISIT: SHIT RENTALSwith The Project

Watch this space...

VISIT MY PORTFOLIO

Andrew Coronis is selling up, and in doing so comes up with typical BULLSHIT...

YEAH... train them to give SFA care to tenants!

INTERESTING... development in Victoria where a VCAT application to evict tenants was dismissed, because the tenants would have become homeless.

CORE HOUSING PROBLEMS

As vacancy rates reach record lows while rents surge to new heights, many Australian renters, essential workers and welfare recipients are struggling to find a place to live...

GET IN TOUCH

Send a message to Gordon Craven, regarding this Pathetic & Disgraceful behaviour by the Coronis Corporate Bully.

Coronis People Contacted for Comment

Find Coronis Rentals Review

ENVIRONMENT LINKS:

TARKINE | WATER SOS

The Coronis Bully* answer to Tenants who stand up for their rights...*
IS TO EVICT THEM!!!
Lies, Dishonesty, Fabrication, Retaliation & Bond Bandit,
it's all part of the Coronis Way

CHOICE ARTICLE 22 April 2024
"We have seen people receive a rent increase and an eviction notice at the same time and essentially told to pick one"

Along with contraventions of the RTRA Act
there are:
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL LEGAL RIGHTS AVAILABLE TO TENANTS

IN
QCAT TENANCY PROCEEDINGS

"It's not the crime, it's the cover up that gets you"
WATERGATE ~ ABC

Talking about PRIVACY... Coronis uses 2Apply.
Apparently it's OK for property owners to be protected from being identified, while tenants have to undergo the ordeals of 2Apply.
SEE THE 2APPLY REVIEW

About Unconscionable Conduct
&
Coronis Real Estate Rentals in Action:

VISIT: SHIT RENTALS
with The Project